Michael Kasdan's passion for science, technology and the entrepreneurial vision of his clients drives his advocacy. As a litigator, he negotiates, defends and asserts IP rights before the courts, the US Patent and Trademark Office, the International Trade Commission and in private arbitration's and mediation. As an advisor, he works with both established companies and start-ups to obtain, evaluate, value, license and develop patent portfolios and trademarks.
Trained in electrical engineering and with a business background as a technology consultant, Mr. Kasdan works with a broad range of technologies, including consumer electronics, wireless devices, computer architecture and networks, semiconductor chips, Internet and e-commerce platforms, and medical products and devices.
Mr. Kasdan's clients rely on him to resolve cases efficiently and cost-effectively. For example:
- In a recent fast-moving ITC case, he spearheaded the two key claim construction issues for the joint defense group. The Administrative Law Judge agreed to stage the claim construction phase on potentially dispositive terms early in the case, which is unusual in the ITC. The success at getting the Court to agree to an early claim construction phase drove favorable early settlements for numerous defendants.
- In a competitor case brought as part of a global patent war between major electronics companies, Mr. Kasdan was instrumental in the defense of patent infringement claims in the semiconductor case and helped to obtain a jury verdict of non-infringement for his client.
- Currently, he is a key member of the ARE team defending a series of patent claims asserting infringement of mechanical processes, inspection processes and the materials structure of diaper and training pant products.
Mr. Kasdan also counsels clients on strategic patent prosecution and portfolio development, and provides opinions and analyses on issues including patent infringement, validity and enforceability.
During 2008-2009, Mr. Kasdan was seconded to Panasonic Corporation in Japan. As in-house patent counsel in Panasonic's licensing center, he acted as lead counsel representing the company in numerous third-party patent assertions and license negotiations, in which he was responsible for developing substantive defensive positions. He also provided legal opinions across a broad set of technology areas and in many facets of patent law, and negotiated complex agreements, including portfolio cross-license agreements. In addition, he worked with the company's managers and engineers to identify high value patents and strengthen their protection, evaluate and mitigate exposure to infringement claims by others and manage patent licensing agreements among global electronics makers, and provided training on all aspects of IP law.
Mr. Kasdan began his career as a technology consultant with Andersen Consulting (now Accenture) during the early stages of Internet technologies. Since his time at NYU School of Law, Mr. Kasdan has been on the ground floor of efforts to turn New York City and State into a hub for innovation and entrepreneurship in technology, Internet, e-commerce and new media. He was an active participant in an incubator for startups through which he counseled new companies on legal, financing and business issues. He is also serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors of CityScience, a nonprofit organization that promotes science, engineering, and math education and teacher development through hands-on projectbased learning in New York City elementary and middle schools.
Today, start-up and early-stage companies find a creative, high energy, businessminded advocate in Mr. Kasdan. He counsels entrepreneurs involved in fashion and design, mobile apps, Internet and ecommerce platforms, as well as other areas where IP issues are crucial to success. In particular, he helps young companies to assess existing IP in their space and guides them on the IP and construction protections available to them as well going forward IP strategy.
Mr. Kasdan frequently writes and speaks on a range of topics including IP litigation, essential patents, and patent monetization and licensing practices, patent eligibility, patent exhaustion, willful infringement, patent misuse and standards estoppel, damages and patent valuation, inequitable conduct, enforcement of standards, social media and privacy issues, and legal ethics. The media often turns to Mr. Kasdan for commentary on ongoing patent cases, key cases and changes in the law, and social media issues.
Mr. Kasdan also teaches as a guest lecturer at his alma mater, NYU, as well as at New York Law School and Seton Hall University School of Law, addressing topics such as patent and trade secret law, IP Licensing, global patent litigation, patent exhaustion, and inequitable conduct.
Mr. Kasdan clerked for the Honorable Judge Roderick R. McKelvie in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Prior to joining Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, he was an associate in the intellectual property group of Kirkland & Ellis LLP.
On the home-front, he is married and a father of two, and is a veteran little league baseball coach.
ARELaw Alerts
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Ninth Circuit Prevents Enforcement of German Injunction of Patents Under FRAND Licensing Obligation
October 15, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Federal Circuit Orders En Banc Review of Alice Corp. Case Regarding Patent Eligibility
October 9, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Induced Infringement of Method Claims Can Be Found Even When No Single Party Performs All of the Claimed Steps
September 7, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
USPTO Issues Final Rules For Implementing New Post-Issuance Patent Validity Proceedings Effective On September 16, 2012
September 4, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
On Remand, Federal Circuit Maintains Previous Holding That Isolated DNA Is Patent-Eligible But Methods Of Comparing Or Analyzing Isolated DNA Are Patent-Ineligible
August 16, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Federal Circuit Confirms That Judge Not Jury Determines Threshold Inquiry For Willfulness Determination
July 30, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Federal Circuit Affirms Computer-Implemented Financial Management Claims Patent-Ineligible As Capable Of Being Performed Mentally
July 30, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
USPTO Issues Proposed Rules For Implementing A First-Inventor-To-File System
July 30, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
USPTO Issues Final Rules Easing Requirements For And Expanding Use Of Third-Party Preissuance Submissions
July 19, 2012
-
ARE Litigation Alert: Federal Circuit Holds Computer-Implemented Financial Transaction Claims Patent-Eligible Because Not Manifestly Abstract
July 10, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Federal Circuit Clarifies Recapture Rule For Analysis Of Reissue Claims
May 11, 2012
-
ARE Litigation Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court Finds Prometheus Method of Diagnosing and/or Treating Unpatentable Law of Nature
March 20, 2012
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
President Obama Signs Leahy-Smith America Invents Act into Law: Overview of Provisions Now In Effect
September 19, 2011
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Overview of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Patents
September 13, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Recent Applications of the Bilski Test for Patentable Subject Matter by The Federal Circuit and District Courts
August 17, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
USPTO Proposes to Revise the Materiality Standard for the Duty to Disclose to Conform with the Therasense
July 22, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
US Supreme Court Grants Cert for the Second Time in Prometheus v. Mayo Case on Patent-Eligible Subject Matter
June 21, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
U.S. Supreme Court Addresses Knowledge Element of Claims for Inducing Patent Infringement
June 1, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Another False Marking Case and Clarifies Meaning of “Patented Article”
May 2, 2011
-
ARE Copyright Litigation Alert:
Southern District Judge Rejects Google Books Amended Settlement Agreement
April 5, 2011
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Federal Circuit Holds That False Marking Must Be Pled With Particularity Under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 9(b)
March 16, 2011
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
Uniloc USA v. Microsoft: Federal Circuit Held the 25% Rule of Thumb By Damages Expert is a Fundamentally Flawed Tool for Determining a Baseline Royalty Rate In Patent Damages Analysis
January 4, 2011
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Supreme Court to Decide Whether Foreign Sale Exhuasts Copyrights
April 23, 2010
-
ARE Trademark Law Alert:
Second Circuit Decides Tiffany v. eBay Appeal
April 1, 2010
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Developments in the Law of Inducement and Direct Infringement
March 8, 2010
-
ARE Patent Litigation Alert:
U.S. Government Files Brief in Bilski v. Kappos
September 26, 2009
-
ARE Patent Law Alert:
Prometheus Labs v. Mayo Clinic: Federal Circuit Applies Transformation Prong of In re Bilski Test and Finds Drug Usage Method Claim to be Patentable Subject Matter Under Section 101
September 17, 2009
Published Articles
-
Intellectual property for startups
- Ernst & Young, Global Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation
-
US jury properly relied upon second considerations of non-obviousness to overcome prima facie obviousness
- November 23, 2012, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2013) doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpt029
-
Isolated human genes and related therapeutic treatment methods held patent-eligible
- January 24, 2013, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 2
-
Induced infringement of method claims where no single party performs all of the claimed steps
- January 24, 2013, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 2
-
US Federal Circuit Confirms That Mere Inclusion Of A Computer Limitation Is Not Dispositive of Patent-Eligibility
- January 3, 2013, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2013, Vol. 8, No. 1
-
Patent Litigation: Mapping a Global Strategy "Practice Note"
- December, 2012, PracticalLaw.com
-
The Dangers Of Hindsight Bias In The Context Of Obviousness
- November 23, 2012, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2012) 7 (11): 779-781. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jps139
-
Global Patent Litigation: Mapping Your Strategy
- November, 2012, Practical Law Company IP & Technology Magazine
-
Monetization of a Firm’s Patent Rights: A Lawyer’s Perspective
- November 02, 2012, Bloomberg BNA, BNA’s Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, 85 PTCJ 22
-
AIA’s Impact on Multidefendant Patent Litigation: Part 2
- October 26, 2012, IPLaw360, Public Policy and Technology Law360, New York
-
AIA’s Impact on Multidefendant Patent Litigation: Part 1
- October 19, 2012, IPLaw360, Public Policy and Technology Law360, New York
-
Injunctions For FRAND-Licensed Patents: Debate Continues
- IPLaw360, Competition Law360, Appellate Law360, New York (October 10, 2012)
-
US Federal Circuit Remains Split On How To Approach Patent Eligibility
- Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2012) doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jps152
-
Gear Up For AIA Post-Issuance Proceedings
- Managing Intellectual Property, September 5, 2012
-
Decision by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Myriad Remand Mirrors Reasoning in NYIPLA Amicus Brief
- New York Intellectual Property Law Association Bulletin, August/September 2012
-
How To Draft Terms Of Service Online
- Managing Intellectual Property, July/August 2012
-
Federal Circuit clarifies three-step recapture rule for analysis of reissued claims
– Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2012) doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jps108
-
Practice Note: Patent Infringement Claims and Defenses (Updated for America Invents Act)
Practical Law Company, New York, (October 15, 2011)
-
Is Facebook Killing Privacy Softly? The Impact of Facebook’s Default Privacy Settings on Online Privacy
- The NYU IP and Entertainment Law Ledger, April 21, 2011
-
Second Circuit Confirms Insurance Company Did Not Have Duty To Defend Action Based on Intellectual Property - Related Claims Under Personal Injury and Advertising Injury Clauses
April 4, 2011
-
CAFC rejects the 25% Rule of Thumb as a Fundamentally Flawed Toll in Reasonable Royalty Calculation (Available only in Japanese)
- Nikkei IP Awareness, January 13, 2011 (published in Japanese)
-
Student Speech in Online Social Networking Sites: Where to Draw the Line
- NYU IP and Entertainment Law Ledger, November 22, 2010(re-published as chapter in introductory edition of Teen Rights and Freedoms: Social Networking (Greenhaven Press, 2012))
-
The Impact Of American Needle On IP And Contracts
- IP Law360, May 26, 2010
-
The 2nd Circ. Stance On Tiffany V. eBay
- IP Law360, April 6, 2010
-
Update To Recent Patent Damages Article
- Patently-O Guest Blog, April 1, 2010
-
Implications of Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick
- IP Law360, March 17, 2010
-
SEB v. Montgomery Ward: Extending the Reach of U.S. Patent Laws to Foreign Defendants—Developments in the Law of Direct Infringement and Inducement
- March 10, 2010
-
Federal Courts Closely Scrutinizing and Slashing Patent Damage Awards
- 2010 Patently-O Patent L.J. 24
-
Will The High Court Clarify The Exhaustion Doctrine?
- IP Law360, January 16, 2008
-
Reviving The Exhaustion Doctrine
- IP Law360, January 10, 2008
-
Quanta Computer v. LG Electronics: Will The Supreme Court Revive The Exhaustion Doctrine?
- Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, LLP, January, 2008
-
Infringement Assertions In The New World Order
IP Law360, October 17, 2007, Guest Column
-
In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal
- Patently-O Patent L.J. 1, May 14, 2007
-
Refining In U.S. Patent Law For Software
- IP Law360, May 7, 2007
-
KSR v. Teleflex, Redefining the Obvious
- IP Law360, May 3, 2007
In The Press
Speaking Engagements
-
March 19, 2013
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY, NY
-
February 19, 2013
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY, NY
-
January 28, 2013
Understanding the Newly Proposed Ethics Rules Before the USPTO
Location: Webinar
-
January 22, 2013
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY, NY
-
January 18, 2013
IP Issues for Start Up Companies
Location: Columbia Business Lab, New York, NY
-
January 15, 2013
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY, NY
-
January 8, 2013
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY, NY
-
December 18, 2012
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY, NY
-
December 11, 2012
Turning Ideas into Companies - The Hatchery - New York Dot Comers (New York, NY) - Meetup.com
Location: Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, 90 Park Avenue, NY NY
-
December 4, 2012
2012 Summit on Global IP Strategy for Corporate Counsel
Location: The Harvard Club, New York, NY
-
November 7, 2012 – November 8, 2012
Social TechNet 4th Annual: Social Media and Big Data IP Counsel Symposium
Location: New York, NY
-
October 22, 2012
Taking the RAND Case To Trial
Location: Live Webinar and Teleconference
-
October 3, 2012
Patent Eligibility for Pharma, Biotech and Beyond: A Review and Discussion of the Mayo and Myriad Cases, from the Celesq®-West LegalEdcenter IP Master Series
Location: Webinar
-
July 25, 2012 – July 26, 2012
The 9th Annual Patents and the Financial Services Industry
Location: New York, NY
-
May 16, 2012 – May 17, 2012
The 4th Annual Corporate IP Counsel Summitt
Location: New York, NY
-
November 16, 2011 – November 17, 2011
3rd Annual Social TechNet Intellectual Property Forum
Location: New Yorker Hotel, New York, NY
-
October 11, 2011 – October 13, 2011
Patent Law Seminar: (i) Licensing - Pitfalls and Strategies for License Negotiations and Agreements; (ii) Willful Infringement after Seagate; (iii) U.S. Patent Litigation For Japanese Companies
Location: Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya, Japan
-
November 15, 2010 – November 16, 2010
World Research Group The TechNet Patents Forum
Location: New York, NY
-
May 11, 2010
Intellectual Property Seminar - (i) The Federal Circuit's en banc decision in Ariad v. Lilly: Implications for Patent Litigation and Patent Prosecution; and (ii) Marking: Why to Mark, When to Mark, How to Mark, and the Dangers of False Marking
Location: Kyoto, Japan
-
March 24, 2010
NYU School of Law - 2010 Trade Regulation Brown Bag Lunch Series: Practicing IP Law In A Global Economy
Location: New York, NY
-
February 25, 2010
InSITE Alumni Advising Session
Location: New York, NY