Amster Rothstein and Ebenstein, LLP - Intellectual Property Law

In The Press:
IPWATCHDOG Turns to Partner Charles R. Macedo for his Insights on SCOTUS decision in Sandoz v. Amgen over Biosimlar Drugs

June 14, 2017

Industry Reaction to SCOTUS decision in Sandoz v. Amgen

By Gene Quinn
 

Charles R. Macedo
Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP

In Sandoz v. Amgen, the Supreme Court addressed the “plain language” of a “carefully crafted and detailed enforcement scheme” relating to “biologic” drugs. Under this complex statute that was enacted as part of ObamaCare as an effort to get generic biosimilar and interchangeable biologic drugs on the market quicker if the patent hurdle can be overcome. In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court vacated, reversed and remanded yet another Federal Circuit decision. Even when the Supreme Court agreed with part of the result arrived at by the Federal Circuit, the Court nevertheless felt obliged to explain why the Federal Circuit had the wrong reason for the correct result.

By rejecting the availability of injunctive relief to enforce a violation of the statutory provisions, some might argue that the Court gutted the protections provided by Congress in reaching the carefully crafted compromise. However, the Court nevertheless offered a few rays of hope.  In footnote 2, when it “express[ed] no view” on an alternative theory on which an injunction might issue under a different provision for this same violation of the statute.  The Court also remanded for potential resolution under state law. The answer to these questions will no doubt be left unresolved by the Court for many more years.

Finally, it is worth mentioning that Justice Breyer’s concurrence is a foreshadowing of the battle we can expect to see next year (in SAS) over the continuing viability of the Chevron doctrine.
Charles R. Macedo is a partner with Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP. He litigates in all areas of intellectual property law, including patent, trademark and copyright law, with a special emphasis in complex litigation and appellate work.

http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/06/14/industry-reaction-scotus-sandoz-v-amgen/id=84473/


View all In the Press

Print

Upcoming Events

View all Events >

RSS FEED

Never miss another publication. Our RSS feed (what is RSS?) will inform you when new articles have been posted.

Amster Rothstein & Ebentein RSS Feed Subscribe now!

AREnet Access
©2007-2017 Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP.    All rights reserved. | Disclaimer