Amster Rothstein and Ebenstein, LLP - Intellectual Property Law

ARE Copyright Alert: New Ruling: Copyright Liability Stems From Use of Embedded Links to Social Media Posts

July 29, 2020
Author(s): Chester Rothstein, Charles R. Macedo, Michael R. Jones

In an alert published on April 16, 2020, we reported on a decision by Judge Kimba Woods of the Southern District of New York, which dismissed a copyright infringement case on a Motion to Dismiss, holding that when a copyright owner posts a photograph on Instagram under a “public” access profile, a third party who embeds a link to the Instagram posting has a valid copyright sublicense through Instagram’s Terms of Use. See Sinclair v. Ziff Davis LLC, No. 18-CV-790 (KMW), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64319 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 13, 2020) (Wood, D.J.) (“Sinclair” and “April 13th Opinion”).

However, citing a subsequent case from another S.D.N.Y. judge, Judge Woods reversed her dismissal, and these two cases may have been at least partially responsible for Instagram to issue a new policy stating that websites should not embed links to photos posted on Instagram without clearing all necessary rights.
Under the old understanding, many website users believed they could simply copy an Instagram page link (or Twitter, Facebook, etc.) without fear of liability if they don’t actually include the underlying photo, because copyright infringement requires “copying,” and if they never copy the photo but instead only copy a link to the photo, they never technically copy the image – and so technically they “don’t infringe (as discussed in our recent April alert). Put another way, the photo never moves from the Instagram/Twitter/Facebook server, and so “copying/infringement” never occurs.
But two recent court rulings have held that posting an embedded link will expose websites to copyright liability.
In McGucken v. Newsweek LLC, (subsequent to Judge Wood’s contrary decision in Sinclair), Judge Failla of the Southern District of New York ruled that, as a matter of law, the act of embedding of a link to a post on Instagram by the defendant Newsweek does not constitute fair use – stating that while Instagram did have a license from McGucken to display the copyrighted image on Instagram, there was no evidence of a license or sublicense from either McGucken or Instagram to Newsweek. McGucken v. Newsweek LLC, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96126 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 2020) (Failla, D.J.).
Judge Failla's decision in McGucken v. Newsweek LLC resulted in Sinclair filing a motion to request that Judge Wood reconsider her contrary decision in Sinclair. In view of McGucken, Judge Wood revised her April 13th opinion “in order to correct clear error.” Revising her April 13th opinion, Judge Wood held that “the pleadings contain[ed] insufficient evidence [to show] that Instagram exercised its right to grant a sublicense to Mashable [(Ziff Davis LLC)].” Judge Wood did, however, “acknowledge[] that it may be possible to read Instagram’s various terms and policies to grant a sublicense to embedders,” – hinting that the story may not be over and that litigation may continue.
Instagram, perhaps in response, has updated and clarified its written policy, noting in a statement to ARS Technica that “While [Instagram’s] terms allow us to grant a sub-license, we do not grant one for our embeds API… Our platform policies require third parties to have the necessary rights from applicable rights holders. This includes ensuring they have a license to share this content, if a license is required by law.” (Lee, “Instagram just threw users of its embedding API under the bus,” ARS Technica (June 4, 2020).
Those rulings, which merely deny early-stage dismissal orders, have the potential to create large waves in the media industry as a whole, but we think the ultimate rule to live by is anything but clear.
We will continue to monitor this issue and report on developments. For more information, please contact us.

Chester Rothstein and Charles R. Macedo are partners, and Michael Jones is an associate at Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP. Their practice involves all aspects of intellectual property law, including copyright and trademark litigation associated with social media. They can be reached at [email protected], [email protected],and [email protected].



View all ARELaw Alerts

Print

Upcoming Events

View all Events >

RSS FEED

Never miss another publication. Our RSS feed (what is RSS?) will inform you when new articles have been posted.

Amster Rothstein & Ebentein RSS Feed Subscribe now!

Linkedin AREnet Access
©2007-2020 Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP.    All rights reserved. | Disclaimer